summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/data/iris/iris.names
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'data/iris/iris.names')
-rw-r--r--data/iris/iris.names69
1 files changed, 69 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/data/iris/iris.names b/data/iris/iris.names
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..062b486
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/iris/iris.names
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+1. Title: Iris Plants Database
+ Updated Sept 21 by C.Blake - Added discrepency information
+
+2. Sources:
+ (a) Creator: R.A. Fisher
+ (b) Donor: Michael Marshall (MARSHALL%PLU@io.arc.nasa.gov)
+ (c) Date: July, 1988
+
+3. Past Usage:
+ - Publications: too many to mention!!! Here are a few.
+ 1. Fisher,R.A. "The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems"
+ Annual Eugenics, 7, Part II, 179-188 (1936); also in "Contributions
+ to Mathematical Statistics" (John Wiley, NY, 1950).
+ 2. Duda,R.O., & Hart,P.E. (1973) Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis.
+ (Q327.D83) John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-22361-1. See page 218.
+ 3. Dasarathy, B.V. (1980) "Nosing Around the Neighborhood: A New System
+ Structure and Classification Rule for Recognition in Partially Exposed
+ Environments". IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine
+ Intelligence, Vol. PAMI-2, No. 1, 67-71.
+ -- Results:
+ -- very low misclassification rates (0% for the setosa class)
+ 4. Gates, G.W. (1972) "The Reduced Nearest Neighbor Rule". IEEE
+ Transactions on Information Theory, May 1972, 431-433.
+ -- Results:
+ -- very low misclassification rates again
+ 5. See also: 1988 MLC Proceedings, 54-64. Cheeseman et al's AUTOCLASS II
+ conceptual clustering system finds 3 classes in the data.
+
+4. Relevant Information:
+ --- This is perhaps the best known database to be found in the pattern
+ recognition literature. Fisher's paper is a classic in the field
+ and is referenced frequently to this day. (See Duda & Hart, for
+ example.) The data set contains 3 classes of 50 instances each,
+ where each class refers to a type of iris plant. One class is
+ linearly separable from the other 2; the latter are NOT linearly
+ separable from each other.
+ --- Predicted attribute: class of iris plant.
+ --- This is an exceedingly simple domain.
+ --- This data differs from the data presented in Fishers article
+ (identified by Steve Chadwick, spchadwick@espeedaz.net )
+ The 35th sample should be: 4.9,3.1,1.5,0.2,"Iris-setosa"
+ where the error is in the fourth feature.
+ The 38th sample: 4.9,3.6,1.4,0.1,"Iris-setosa"
+ where the errors are in the second and third features.
+
+5. Number of Instances: 150 (50 in each of three classes)
+
+6. Number of Attributes: 4 numeric, predictive attributes and the class
+
+7. Attribute Information:
+ 1. sepal length in cm
+ 2. sepal width in cm
+ 3. petal length in cm
+ 4. petal width in cm
+ 5. class:
+ -- Iris Setosa
+ -- Iris Versicolour
+ -- Iris Virginica
+
+8. Missing Attribute Values: None
+
+Summary Statistics:
+ Min Max Mean SD Class Correlation
+ sepal length: 4.3 7.9 5.84 0.83 0.7826
+ sepal width: 2.0 4.4 3.05 0.43 -0.4194
+ petal length: 1.0 6.9 3.76 1.76 0.9490 (high!)
+ petal width: 0.1 2.5 1.20 0.76 0.9565 (high!)
+
+9. Class Distribution: 33.3% for each of 3 classes.