summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/report
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorccb@cs.jhu.edu <ccb@cs.jhu.edu@ec762483-ff6d-05da-a07a-a48fb63a330f>2010-08-17 20:07:57 +0000
committerccb@cs.jhu.edu <ccb@cs.jhu.edu@ec762483-ff6d-05da-a07a-a48fb63a330f>2010-08-17 20:07:57 +0000
commit1080affc3484d7c5e5a0c3124273be8a7e76c2e0 (patch)
tree54b904e918226b97b9a17799807f30059f860af6 /report
parent5a789ea2fad89e5beecbe7020431da33bb7f48f9 (diff)
Working on the SCFG section
git-svn-id: https://ws10smt.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@581 ec762483-ff6d-05da-a07a-a48fb63a330f
Diffstat (limited to 'report')
-rw-r--r--report/SCFGs.tex51
-rw-r--r--report/SCFGs/english-step0.pdfbin0 -> 21396 bytes
-rw-r--r--report/SCFGs/english-step1.pdfbin0 -> 21961 bytes
-rw-r--r--report/SCFGs/english-step2.pdfbin0 -> 22319 bytes
-rw-r--r--report/SCFGs/english-step3.pdfbin0 -> 22999 bytes
-rw-r--r--report/SCFGs/english-step4.pdfbin0 -> 23985 bytes
-rw-r--r--report/SCFGs/example-scfg.pdfbin0 -> 28986 bytes
-rw-r--r--report/SCFGs/urdu-input.pdfbin0 -> 12765 bytes
-rw-r--r--report/SCFGs/urdu-step0.pdfbin0 -> 24914 bytes
-rw-r--r--report/SCFGs/urdu-step1.pdfbin0 -> 25488 bytes
-rw-r--r--report/SCFGs/urdu-step2.pdfbin0 -> 25868 bytes
-rw-r--r--report/SCFGs/urdu-step3.pdfbin0 -> 26522 bytes
-rw-r--r--report/SCFGs/urdu-step4.pdfbin0 -> 27517 bytes
-rwxr-xr-xreport/report.tex1
14 files changed, 41 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/report/SCFGs.tex b/report/SCFGs.tex
index 0002405d..3441c7db 100644
--- a/report/SCFGs.tex
+++ b/report/SCFGs.tex
@@ -1,22 +1,51 @@
\chapter{Synchronous context free grammars} \label{sec:scfg}
-%\subsubsection*{Synchronous context free grammar} \label{sec:scfg}
-\begin{figure}[t]
+
+The translation models used in this workshop are synchronous context free grammars (SCFGs).
+SCFGs \cite{lewis68scfg} generalizes context-free grammars to generate strings concurrently in two (or more) languages. A string pair is generated by applying a series of paired rewrite rules of the form, $X \rightarrow \langle \mathbf{e}, \mathbf{f}, \mathbf{a} \rangle$, where $X$ is a non-terminal, $\mathbf{e}$ and $\mathbf{f}$ are strings of terminals and non-terminals and $\mathbf{a}$ specifies a one-to-one alignment between non-terminals in $\mathbf{e}$ and $\mathbf{f}$.
+In the statistical machine translation, the two righthand sides of SCFG rules represent the source and target languages. The process of translation occurs by parsing the source sentence, which induces a parallel tree structure and translation in the target language \cite{chiang07hierarchical}.
+Terminal are rewritten as pairs of strings of terminal symbols in the source and target languages. Additionally, one side of a terminal expansion may be the special symbol $\epsilon$, which indicates a null alignment which permits arbitrary insertions and deletions.
+Figure \ref{fig:toy-scfg} gives an example SCFG between Urdu and English. Figure \ref{fig:toy-scfg-parse} shows how the SCFG is used to derive the translation of an input Urdu sentence.
+
+
+
+
+\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
-\includegraphics[width=0.6\columnwidth]{example_derivation2.pdf}
+\includegraphics[width=.6\linewidth]{SCFGs/example-scfg}
\end{center}
-\caption[Derivation]{An example SCFG derivation from a Chinese source sentence which yields the English sentence: {\em ``Brown arrived in Shanghai from Beijing late last night.''}. The non-terminal alignment $\mathbf{a}$ is specified by the variable subscripts.}
-\label{fig:intro_example_derivation}
+\caption{A toy example that illustrates a SCFG that can translate (romanized) Urdu into English for one sentence. }\label{fig:toy-scfg}
\end{figure}
-The translation models discussed explored in this workshop are based on synchronous grammars.
-Here we provide a short definition of the formalism we've employed: synchronous context free grammar (SCFG).
-A synchronous context free grammar (SCFG, \cite{lewis68scfg}) generalizes context-free grammars to generate strings concurrently in two (or more) languages. A string pair is generated by applying a series of paired rewrite rules of the form, $X \rightarrow \langle \mathbf{e}, \mathbf{f}, \mathbf{a} \rangle$, where $X$ is a non-terminal, $\mathbf{e}$ and $\mathbf{f}$ are strings of terminals and non-terminals and $\mathbf{a}$ specifies a one-to-one alignment between non-terminals in $\mathbf{e}$ and $\mathbf{f}$.
-In the context of SMT, by assigning the source and target languages to the respective sides of a probabilistic SCFG it is possible to describe translation as the process of parsing the source sentence, which induces a parallel tree structure and translation in the target language \cite{chiang07hierarchical}.
-Terminal are rewritten as pairs of strings of terminal symbols in the source and target languages. Additionally, one side of a terminal expansion may be the special symbol $\epsilon$, which indicates a null alignment which permits arbitrary insertions and deletions.
-Figure \ref{fig:intro_example_derivation} is an example derivation for Chinese to English translation using an SCFG of the form that I propose to learn using non-parametric Bayesian models.
+
+\begin{figure}
+\begin{tabular}{lll}
+\multicolumn{3}{>{\columncolor[rgb]{0.95,0.95,0.75}}c}{The input is an Urdu sentence which is initially unanalyzed.}\\
+\includegraphics[width=.45\linewidth]{SCFGs/urdu-input} & &
+\\ \hline
+\multicolumn{3}{>{\columncolor[rgb]{0.95,0.95,0.75}}c}{Here all of the terminal symbols receive non-terminal labels. The English words are in Urdu order.}\\
+\includegraphics[width=.45\linewidth]{SCFGs/urdu-step0} & &
+\includegraphics[width=.45\linewidth]{SCFGs/english-step0} \\ \hline
+\multicolumn{3}{>{\columncolor[rgb]{0.95,0.95,0.75}}c}{The PP rule reorders the Urdu postpositional phrase to be a prepositional phrase on the English side.}\\\includegraphics[width=.45\linewidth]{SCFGs/urdu-step1} & &
+\includegraphics[width=.45\linewidth]{SCFGs/english-step1} \\ \hline\multicolumn{3}{>{\columncolor[rgb]{0.95,0.95,0.75}}c}{The English auxiliary verb and main verb get reordered with the application of the VP rule.}\\
+\includegraphics[width=.45\linewidth]{SCFGs/urdu-step2} & &
+\includegraphics[width=.45\linewidth]{SCFGs/english-step2} \\ \hline
+\multicolumn{3}{>{\columncolor[rgb]{0.95,0.95,0.75}}c}{This VP rule moves the English verb from the Urdu verb-final position to its correct place before the PP.}\\
+\includegraphics[width=.45\linewidth]{SCFGs/urdu-step3} & & \includegraphics[width=.45\linewidth]{SCFGs/english-step3} \\ \hline
+\multicolumn{3}{>{\columncolor[rgb]{0.95,0.95,0.75}}c}{Applying the S rule, means that we have a complete translation of the Urdu sentence.}\\
+\includegraphics[width=.45\linewidth]{SCFGs/urdu-step4} & & \includegraphics[width=.45\linewidth]{SCFGs/english-step4}
+\end{tabular}
+\caption{Using SCFGs as the underlying formalism means that the process of translation is one of parsing. This shows how an English sentence can be generated by parsing the Urdu sentence using the rules given in Figure \ref{fig:toy-scfg}}\label{fig:toy-scfg-parse}
+\end{figure}
+
+
+
+
+
+
+% of the form that I propose to learn using non-parametric Bayesian models.
The generative story is as follows.
In the beginning was the grammar, in which we allow two types of rules: {\emph non-terminal} and {\emph terminal} expansions.
diff --git a/report/SCFGs/english-step0.pdf b/report/SCFGs/english-step0.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e8964fba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/report/SCFGs/english-step0.pdf
Binary files differ
diff --git a/report/SCFGs/english-step1.pdf b/report/SCFGs/english-step1.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..29f56f1b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/report/SCFGs/english-step1.pdf
Binary files differ
diff --git a/report/SCFGs/english-step2.pdf b/report/SCFGs/english-step2.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4afb06b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/report/SCFGs/english-step2.pdf
Binary files differ
diff --git a/report/SCFGs/english-step3.pdf b/report/SCFGs/english-step3.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1926b4dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/report/SCFGs/english-step3.pdf
Binary files differ
diff --git a/report/SCFGs/english-step4.pdf b/report/SCFGs/english-step4.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ccc13807
--- /dev/null
+++ b/report/SCFGs/english-step4.pdf
Binary files differ
diff --git a/report/SCFGs/example-scfg.pdf b/report/SCFGs/example-scfg.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bc7e411e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/report/SCFGs/example-scfg.pdf
Binary files differ
diff --git a/report/SCFGs/urdu-input.pdf b/report/SCFGs/urdu-input.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a367dbb8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/report/SCFGs/urdu-input.pdf
Binary files differ
diff --git a/report/SCFGs/urdu-step0.pdf b/report/SCFGs/urdu-step0.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..31a225b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/report/SCFGs/urdu-step0.pdf
Binary files differ
diff --git a/report/SCFGs/urdu-step1.pdf b/report/SCFGs/urdu-step1.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5d386332
--- /dev/null
+++ b/report/SCFGs/urdu-step1.pdf
Binary files differ
diff --git a/report/SCFGs/urdu-step2.pdf b/report/SCFGs/urdu-step2.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..13cd73dc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/report/SCFGs/urdu-step2.pdf
Binary files differ
diff --git a/report/SCFGs/urdu-step3.pdf b/report/SCFGs/urdu-step3.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..15636844
--- /dev/null
+++ b/report/SCFGs/urdu-step3.pdf
Binary files differ
diff --git a/report/SCFGs/urdu-step4.pdf b/report/SCFGs/urdu-step4.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6a5fa2a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/report/SCFGs/urdu-step4.pdf
Binary files differ
diff --git a/report/report.tex b/report/report.tex
index b0f8e223..98a3ff0a 100755
--- a/report/report.tex
+++ b/report/report.tex
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
\usepackage{epic,eepic}
\usepackage{boxedminipage}
\usepackage{fancybox}
+\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage[square]{natbib}
\usepackage{epsfig}
%\usepackage{subfig}