Serializer Benchmark
====================
Comparing parsing speed/memory usage of all C++ JSON libs I could find. Also including two msgpack implementations (C++/Ruby).
Goal is to output object.edges.last.rule.substr(1, 4).
Data are fairly large and complex objects (hypergraph representations) with a lot of different types, e.g. strings (ASCII), ints, floats, arrays
and sub-objects. Download data here [4] and put in the data/ directory.
Note that the comparison is unfair for some parsers, as they just do SAX-style parsing and do not actually fill "real" objects
with data (e.g. the cdec json parser).
* cdec-json-parser: ripped out of [1].
* gason: git clone https://github.com/vivkin/gason.git
* JsonBox: git clone https://github.com/anhero/JsonBox.git
* jsoncpp: git clone https://github.com/open-source-parsers/jsoncpp.git
* json-cpp: git clone "https://github.com/ascheglov/json-cpp.git"
* jsonxx: git clone https://github.com/hjiang/jsonxx.git
* libjson: wget "http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/libjson/libjson_7.6.1.zip?r=&ts=1405248411&use_mirror=heanet"
* MicroJSON: wget http://grigory.info/distfiles/MicroJSON-0.3.2.tar.bz2
* msgpack-c: git clone https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-c.git
* msgpack-ruby: gem install msgpack
* nosjob: go to [2] and figure out how to download a tarball
* picojson: git clone https://github.com/kazuho/picojson.git
* rapidjson: git clone https://github.com/miloyip/rapidjson.git
* sajson: git clone https://github.com/chadaustin/sajson.git
Put all libraries in lib/ and build as described by the authors of the respective
library.
To run the benchmark You'll need root privileges to clear the disk caches.
The run scripts assume that these scripts [3] are in the PATH.
Versions:
---------
* cdec-json-parser: SHA-1 d124d4aaa78b52b46f7ac8d7306be342d3405124
* gason: SHA-1 ede29fc5f0de8e47fd82c09f2f98123d2c867f28
* JsonBox: SHA-1 fcb82ebae41dffb90d32a49ac236d1608d9a67ee
* jsoncpp: SHA-1 655a9db0cc62394e81d3074a98c7191fbfc00259
* json-cpp: SHA-1 170121e2dc099895064305e38bfb25d90a807ce3
* libjson: version 7.6.1
* MicroJSON: version 0.3.2
* msgpack-c: SHA-1 197ed8c983a70d5892bf73dcd1a352bf8e2588df
* msgpack-ruby: version 0.5.8
* nosjob: SHA-1 e1d67401fcda6e05a536272532bdb9770bec27e8
* picojson: SHA-1 5e71db9bec7f22a041cd251c6d6d67e954396d5d
* rapidjson: SHA-1 63d054349ab56d278060cd3373e76a6933cf194a
* sajson: SHA-1 003988269f1774dfb184e1864f2f4e654965581e
---
* [1] https://github.com/redpony/cdec/tree/master/decoder
* [2] http://fossil.wanderinghorse.net/repos/nosjob/index.cgi/index
* [3] https://github.com/pks/scripts
* [4] http://simianer.de/serializer-benchmark-data.tar.gz
Results
=======
*Spoiler:* sajson and rapidjson are the fastest JSON parsers -- but msgpack is even faster.
Benchmarks were run on my trusty laptop (IBM/Lenovo X61s):
Linux x 3.12.23 #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Jul 4 15:09:43 CEST 2014 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7500 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
Disk is an Intel X25-E SSD.
JSON parsing benchmark
----------------------
REAPEAT=10
[test_cdec_json_parser]
data/1020.json: 8.81 s
data/1570.json: 3.07 s
data/1391.json: 1.99 s
data/429.json: 0.6 s
data/2002.json: 0.32 s
data/1889.json: 0.07 s
data/1495.json: 0.01 s
data/748.json: 0.0 s
---
overall: 1.84 s
memory: 1 m
[test_gason]
data/1020.json: 4.34 s
data/1570.json: 1.52 s
data/1391.json: 1.05 s
data/429.json: 0.29 s
data/2002.json: 0.16 s
data/1889.json: 0.03 s
data/1495.json: 0.01 s
data/748.json: 0.01 s
---
overall: 0.91 s
memory: 389 m
[test_JsonBox]
data/1020.json: 36.15 s
data/1570.json: 11.91 s
data/1391.json: 8.25 s
data/429.json: 2.3 s
data/2002.json: 1.21 s
data/1889.json: 0.24 s
data/1495.json: 0.02 s
data/748.json: 0.0 s
---
overall: 7.42 s
memory: 901 m
[test_jsoncpp]
data/1020.json: 9.59 s
data/1570.json: 3.32 s
data/1391.json: 2.19 s
data/429.json: 0.64 s
data/2002.json: 0.34 s
data/1889.json: 0.07 s
data/1495.json: 0.01 s
data/748.json: 0.01 s
---
overall: 2.0 s
memory: 804 m
[test_json-cpp]
data/1020.json: 4.32 s
data/1570.json: 1.44 s
data/1391.json: 0.99 s
data/429.json: 0.28 s
data/2002.json: 0.15 s
data/1889.json: 0.03 s
data/1495.json: 0.01 s
data/748.json: 0.0 s
---
overall: 0.89 s
memory: 263 m
[test_jsonxx]
data/1020.json: 36.85 s
data/1570.json: 12.86 s
data/1391.json: 8.36 s
data/429.json: 2.4 s
data/2002.json: 1.29 s
data/1889.json: 0.26 s
data/1495.json: 0.01 s
data/748.json: 0.0 s
---
overall: 7.66 s
memory: 1440 m
[test_libjson]
data/1020.json: 13.09 s
data/1570.json: 4.51 s
data/1391.json: 3.0 s
data/429.json: 0.86 s
data/2002.json: 0.46 s
data/1889.json: 0.09 s
data/1495.json: 0.01 s
data/748.json: 0.0 s
---
overall: 2.72 s
memory: 1649 m
[test_nosjob]
data/1020.json: 17.64 s
data/1570.json: 6.18 s
data/1391.json: 4.09 s
data/429.json: 1.16 s
data/2002.json: 0.62 s
data/1889.json: 0.13 s
data/1495.json: 0.01 s
data/748.json: 0.0 s
---
overall: 3.68 s
memory: 931 m
[test_picojson]
data/1020.json: 17.35 s
data/1570.json: 5.51 s
data/1391.json: 3.97 s
data/429.json: 1.07 s
data/2002.json: 0.55 s
data/1889.json: 0.11 s
data/1495.json: 0.01 s
data/748.json: 0.01 s
---
overall: 3.53 s
memory: 1049 m
[test_rapidjson]
data/1020.json: 3.27 s
data/1570.json: 1.08 s
data/1391.json: 0.75 s
data/429.json: 0.21 s
data/2002.json: 0.11 s
data/1889.json: 0.03 s
data/1495.json: 0.01 s
data/748.json: 0.0 s
---
overall: 0.67 s
memory: 415 m
[test_sajson]
data/1020.json: 2.94 s
data/1570.json: 0.97 s
data/1391.json: 0.66 s
data/429.json: 0.19 s
data/2002.json: 0.1 s
data/1889.json: 0.02 s
data/1495.json: 0.0 s
data/748.json: 0.0 s
---
overall: 0.6 s
memory: 293 m
MSGPACK parsing benchmark
-------------------------
REAPEAT=10
[test_msgpack]
data/1020.pak: 2.24 s
data/1570.pak: 0.82 s
data/1391.pak: 0.51 s
data/429.pak: 0.15 s
data/2002.pak: 0.08 s
data/1889.pak: 0.02 s
data/1495.pak: 0.0 s
data/748.pak: 0.0 s
---
overall: 0.47
memory: 446 m
[test_msgpack_streaming]
data/1020.pak2: 0.8 s
data/1570.pak2: 0.28 s
data/1391.pak2: 0.18 s
data/429.pak2: 0.06 s
data/2002.pak2: 0.04 s
data/1889.pak2: 0.01 s
data/1495.pak2: 0.0 s
data/748.pak2: 0.0 s
---
overall: 0.17
memory: 175 m
[test_msgpack_ruby]
data/1020.pak: 1.94 s
data/1570.pak: 0.77 s
data/1391.pak: 0.52 s
data/429.pak: 0.24 s
data/2002.pak: 0.19 s
data/1889.pak: 0.14 s
data/1495.pak: 0.13 s
data/748.pak: 0.13 s
---
overall: 0.5
memory: 224 m